Search for: "Cresswell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
In Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) handed down on 26 April 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams held that a sexual abuse victim, Nina Cresswell, had successfully defended a libel claim brought by the perpetrator, William Hay. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Cherry cited  Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(d)(1) and (3) in his brief in support of his petition but the Second Circuit, citing Cresswell v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB).Tattoo artist William Hay took libel action against Nina Cresswell, a woman who published a blog and social media posts stating that he had violently sexually assaulted her 10 years earlier. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) and Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB) both centred on allegations, published online by the Defendants, that the Claimants had committed acts of sexual violence. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 26 April 2023, Heather Williams J handed down judgement in the case of Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
On 20 to 23 February 2023 Heather Williams J heard the trial in the case of Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:04 am by Erin Kristofco
Bd. of Assessment Appeals of State of Colo., 947 P.2d 1373, 1374 (Colo. 1997) (person may not act as appraiser or expert witness and present expert testimony under contingent fee agreements); Cresswell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:44 am by Ron Clark and Alex Brandt
The report goes on to state that the dangers of crew fatigue can be mitigated through the introduction and development of effective Fatigue Risk Management Systems. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The News Media Association (NMA) and National Union of Journalists issued statements stating that the changes would “weaken the flow of information from police forces to the general public, undermining the public right to know. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The ICO released a statement in response, stating that it does not share the views of the report. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]