Search for: "Crisp v. Crisp"
Results 1 - 20
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 7:40 am
If the TTAB takes the same amount of time in deciding where “pretzel crisps” falls on the Spectrum of Distinctiveness, it will be July before we know the answer, but something tells me the TTAB’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:57 am
Princeton Vanguard, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
See Marvin Ginn Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
" Snyder's Lance, Inc. and Princeton Vanguard, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 3:33 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:05 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
No this isn't IPKatSee Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) and in particular the glorious write up here.Food gets a 0% VAT rate. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 5:39 am
The Court of Appeals NFP decision March 4th in the case of Kara Crisp v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:25 pm
Supreme Court ruled “shredded wheat” generic for a type of cereal in Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:10 pm
From the perspective of its critics, that describes Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm
Errata correction in Hynix v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 4:26 pm
Now, thanks to a ruling today by the DC Circuit in US v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 9:25 am
Crisp, clean, and entirely right.And about a civil procedure issue too; namely, the relationship between consolidation in state court and removal of "mass actions" under CAFA.Judge Watford brings a smile to my face. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 7:06 am
Scott v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:34 am
The Fourth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:38 am
It's crisp. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:43 am
Marketing, creative and design types should pay close attention to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 4:24 pm
Supreme Court will hear arguments in Murr v. [read post]
