Search for: "Cross v. Department of Interior" Results 41 - 60 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm by Lucas Guttentag
How the COVID-19 Expulsion Policy Works The CDC Order is based on an emergency Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Interim Final Rule issued simultaneously with the Order under the authority of an obscure provision of the 1944 Public Health Service Act. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
Officials from the HHSA’s Epidemiology Program and County Department of Environmental Health are investigating the cluster of four infections, officials said. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
(The grilling occurs in one of the court building’s interior courtyards.) [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
Congress authorized the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Interior Indian Affairs (DOI), to promulgate rules and regulations Aas may be necessary to carry out the provisions of [ICWA]@ (25 USC ' 1952). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:30 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bridging the jurisdictional void: Cross-deputization agreements in Indian Country. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:38 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Bridging the jurisdictional void: Cross-deputization agreements in Indian Country. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:38 pm by Unknown
Bridging the jurisdictional void: Cross-deputization agreements in Indian Country. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:31 pm by Matthew Kahn
  The Supreme Court upheld the legality of those measures in Sale v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm by Richard Hunt
Aug. 9, 2018) answers a question that the Department of Justice has already answered in its regulations concerning closed captioning in movies. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]