Search for: "Cross v. Hall County"
Results 61 - 80
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
”In Hall, judicial review took the following form. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Travis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
[s]hall have not less than 2/32 inch tread measurable in all major grooves," and OCGA § 40-6-180, driving too fast for conditions. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
After a thorough investigation, the county officials concluded that her use of marijuana was entirely lawful as a matter of California law. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court granted cert in Timbs v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Blakely v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
See Hall v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Note: Compare with Dick Heller of Heller v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
Itawamba County School Board. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
The estimated cost is £100,000; the funds are already available following the sale of the village school/hall in May 2014 by auction for the sum of £108,000 [8]. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:28 am
Hall 2005). [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:02 pm
These were the issues discussed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its April 5, 2017 decision in Hall v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
