Search for: "Cross v. Mintzes" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve named it after Quick Draw McGraw, one of my favorite, classic Saturday morning TV cartoons, and because it so nicely describes the unusual buy-sell mechanism enforced by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in his fascinating decision earlier this month in Mintz v Pazer, Decision and Order, Index No. 502127/13 [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 12, 2014]. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Justice Ling-Cohan writes a basic textbook of how an account stated case is decided in an attorney fee setting in Mintz & Fraade, P.C. v Docuport, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:03 am
 Click here to go to www.nylj.com Island Park LLC, plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Mintz cross-appeals from the sanctions award.Roberts v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:07 am by admin
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recognized in the recent case of Mintz v Dietz & Watson that if either (a) the problem or (b) the solution is non-obvious, then the invention meets the non-obvious requirement for patentability. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This is insufficient to make out a claim under Judiciary Law§ 487 (see Mintz v Rosenberg, Mine, Falkojf & Wolff, LLP, 53 Misc 3d 132(A), 2016 NY Slip Op 51388[U] [App Term, pt Dept 2016] [“The allegations that defendants filed a certificate of merit and/or a note of issue in the prior action when they lacked sufficient supporting medical expert opinion were not ‘sufficiently egregious’ to support (a Judiciary Law§ 487) claim”]). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
- Pittsburgh lawyer David Wagner of Reed Smith on the firm's Environmental Law Resource Estate of Jorgensen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
But the impact of past decisions may pale in comparison to the Court's resolution, to be made next year, of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]