Search for: "Cross v. Nike Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2007, 4:36 pm
On February 27, the Eastern District of California denied cross-motions for summary judgment on Nike’s dilution claim in Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:29 am
Nike, Inc., 2012 WL 7017821 (N.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co Hayk Kupelyants & Sylvain Bollée, Interpretation at cross-purposes: Dallah v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
Applying the factors set out in Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:37 am
”The case is Rentmeester v Nike Inc, 9th U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
” Nike Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
The blaze marks analysisis a useful guide for evaluating laundry-list disclosures,like the one in Forward’s ’871 application. (...)Recently in Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:07 am
Moreover, the Board likened this case to Nike v. [read post]
Federal Circuit denies Google motion to terminate Apple's appeal of Wisconsin rate-setting dismissal
3 May 2013, 9:23 am
Nike, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Isonas, Inc., 2014 WL 10988340 (C.D. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
’ These customized Nike Air Max 97 sneakers were created in collaboration with rapper Lil Nas X and featured provocative design elements, including a drop of genuine human blood, an upside-down cross, and a Pentagram c [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
Nike, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
Viacom (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Affinity – Apple, Nike motion to stay denied by Judge Wilken: Affinity Labs v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
Industrial Revolution, Inc (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Batesville Services – ITC issues limited exclusion order in Certain Caskets (337-TA-725) (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) Global-Tech Appliances – Supreme Court: Amicus briefs filed: Global Tech v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
– General Court rejects appeal concerning speed reducing gearbox Case T-246/10 Francisco Ivars v OHIM – Motive intervening (Class 99) Nike in General Court: DYNAMIC SUPPORT and VICTORY RED: T-512/10, T-356/10 (Class 46) General Court: PIPELINE and absolute grounds: T-87/10 (Class 46) Is territoriality dead? [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al. [read post]
