Search for: "Cross v. Owens" Results 21 - 40 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This is exactly what happened in Conklin v Owen ;2010 NY Slip Op 03399 ; Decided on April 27, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department . [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 6:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Libbey-Owens Ford Co., 758 F.2d 613, 624 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am by MBettman
Owens, 484 U.S. 554 (1988) (The Confrontation Clause guarantees only an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.) [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"To succeed on their motion for summary judgment, the defendants were required to demonstrate that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of a legal malpractice cause of action (see Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007; Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578). [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, a federal district court in Illinois denied the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Henson v Canon Business Solutions, Inc, September 24, 2014, Kendall, V). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Jon Sands
But it held that the defendant here was not denied that right because he was an active participant in the hearing and cross-examined witnesses. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
  In the recent case of Owen v Galgey & Ors.,[2] the English High Court was faced with the issue of applying Article 4 of Rome II to a personal injury case. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
Owen, the 6th District reverses the grant of a civil protection order against a juvenile. [read post]