Search for: "Cross v. U.s.*"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
Cross Match argues that the question is largely answered by Young Eng’rs, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:50 am
The case is styled, Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 9:19 pm
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of patent eligibility under § 101 with regard to one of... [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:32 am
Brief in Support of First Motion (July 2014) Statement of Undisputed Facts (First Motion) As a result of the fact that (a) Defendants allowed no testimony at 48-hour hearings, (b) Defendants allowed no cross-examination at 48-hour hearings, (c) often the only questions asked of the parents in a 48-hour hearing were for purposes of identification and to see if they understood their rights, and (d) Defendants never conducted the inquiries required by 25 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
The opinion is styled, Kirstin Walker v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Today's IRAP v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:32 pm
(collectively, "Blizzard") cross-appealed portions of the Board's decisions holding that the Lin article is not a printed publication under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
See Medicines Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:30 am
The appeal in Kelly v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:47 pm
The Sixth Circuit held today in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am
The government’s long-awaited proposal for addressing cross-border data requests, in the form of draft legislation, is finally here. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Free Stream Media Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
See Chafin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:14 am
Supreme Court decides New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:19 pm
See Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:33 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:56 am
Magedson, MA v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm
Of note, this case involved a cross-certification by the Judge Advocate General of the Army. [read post]
