Search for: "Crown Body Corp. v. City of L. A."
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
This qualified authority, unlike the power often exercised in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by the English Crown, is limited to the promotion of advances in the “useful arts. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: No access to ‘non-minor amendments’ on EU website (Class 46) EPO gets access to India’s traditional knowledge digital library (Spicy IP) Germany Bundesgerichtshof clarifies circumstances under which work may be considered ‘not published’ under s 71 Copyright Act in case concerning Vivaldi’s ‘Motezuma’ (IPKat) Federal Patent Court: ‘Die Drachenjäger’ (the dragon hunter) devoid of… [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Newly available: Barron, Anne, ‘Graduated Response’ à L’Anglaise: Online Copyright Infringement and the Digital Economy Act (U.K.) 2010 (December 19, 2011). [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
While a substantial and complex body of case law has developed under RICO, the following are the main issues that bear on the viability of such a claim against the lawyers and medical professionals who are responsible for allegedly bogus claims, such as were seen in the Silica MDL: The existence of repeated instances of the misconduct on which the RICO claim is predicated; A showing that there has been a pattern or practice of such misconduct; Proof that a person has conducted the affairs… [read post]
