Search for: "D’AGOSTINO V. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The FDA’s actions led the drug companies voluntarily to withdraw PPA-containing products. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 11:40 am
D’Agostino has a bachelor’s degree in political science from Penn State University and a law degree from Hoftsra University. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:39 pm
D’Agostino v. ev3, Inc., 845 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016), was seen as a death knell for the fraud‑on-the-FDA theory in FCA cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm
If a Chinese citizen leaves its Hukou address and resides in another address continuously for more than one year, the latter address becomes his habitual residence and the court in that address also has jurisdiction. [8] Blohn v Desser [1962] 2 Q.B. 116, 123; Rossano v Manufacturers’ Life Insurance Co Ltd [1963] 2 Q.B. 352, 382–383; Vogel v RA Kohnstamm Ltd [1973] Q.B. 133; see also Patterson v… [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
The BBC has also noted recent statements from Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister stating that suspects are to be tried in Saudi Arabia and profiled Khashoggi. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:15 am
New York State Insurance Fund, October 9, 2018, D’Agostino, M.). [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:28 am
“The court correctly determined that the first cause of action, although denominated a claim for professional malpractice, also states a cause of action for breach of contract (see generally Foley v D’Agostino, 21 AD2d 60, 65 [1st Dept 1964]). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Feb. 12, 2018), Judge Mae D’Agostino of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York weighed in on the issue of when state court orders for removal and remediation resolve a potentially responsible party's liability to the government under Section 113 of CERCLA, and in this case allowing, for at least the time being, Section 107 claims to proceed where there was no clear guidance from the Second Circuit. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
For example, last year in D’Agostino v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
The complaint “is deemed to allege whatever can be implied from its statements by fair and reasonable intendment” (Foley v D’Agostino, 21 AD2d 60, 65 [1964] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:35 pm
D’Agostino v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
”In Matter of D'Agostino v DiNapoli, 24 Misc 3d 1090, one of the relatively few State court decisions that consider the extent of the protections provided by Article V, §7 of New York State Constitution's, the court said that Article V, §7 “merely provides that retirement system benefits are contractual in nature and may not be impaired or diminished by state action. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm
San Juan County] Redistricting: unanimous Court declines to strike down population variance that may have assisted Arizona plan in VRA compliance [ABA Journal] “Supreme Court Should Protect Workers Against Government-Union Collusion” [Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber, Cato on D’Agostino v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
In that case, D’Agostino v. [read post]
