Search for: "DAVID HEATH LONG v. THE STATE" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Congress has practically concluded its 117th term without passing the Open App Markets Act (OAMA) into law. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
In past posts,[1] I have called attention to a project launched by historian David K. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
And OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB) in which he again redefined the boundaries relating to Article 8, granting a contra mundem injunction to protect the Claimants’ right of privacy in a “straight forward and blatent blackmail” case, where there was solid evidence about the state of heath of the Claimants and the extremely negative consequences publication would entail. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States In the case of Hedine v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm by Bill Marler
Well, for whatever the reason the SLO County Public Heath authorities are remaining quiet as is the local media. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]