Search for: "DECKERS CORP V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2012, 8:00 pm
For me, Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:31 am
**There was an issue of PTAB's use of BRI, which did NOTeffect the outcome:Claims of an expired patent are giventheir ordinary and customary meaning in accordance withour opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:58 am
In Butler v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court opinion in Echabazal v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:37 am
Energen Resources Corp. et al. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Benson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
I am thinking about test cases because of Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 5:10 am
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:13 am
If you handle classification cases in the Court of International Trade, this is an important case: Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:41 am
Co., LP v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:23 am
” Quoting Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
The Board's recognition of a "family of marks" is about as rare as a fish in a tree, but in Black & Decker Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
” Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:53 pm
Polaroid Corp. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm
The Northern District of Illinois recently debated this in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 4:44 am
The farmers relied upon the 2012 Texas Supreme Court decision Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
Dynamic Lighting (light fixture); Deckers v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
Dynamic Lighting (light fixture); Deckers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:12 am
See e.g., Amsted Industries Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:20 am
Deckers Outdoor Corp., 0:11-cv-00154. [read post]
