Search for: "DIAMOND v. US " Results 41 - 60 of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Finally, Diamond tried to get the court to adopt the rule of Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:47 pm
The Hawaii Supreme Court has accepted an application for writ of certiorari to review the Intermediate Court of Appeals' decision in Save Diamond Head Waters LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 8:11 pm
However, the USPTO does not believe that such a broad reading of those rulings is consistent with the Supreme Court's views on the eligibility of "process" patents, as set forth in Diamond v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:00 pm by Patent Docs
That dictum is said to follow from Diamond v Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 and Funk Brothers v Kalo Inoculant, 333 U.S. 127. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Zheng Cai, DBA Tai Chi Green Tea Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm by Megan Bannigan
’s $25 million summary judgment win against Costco Wholesale Corp. in a dispute over Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” to identify a specific type of six-prong diamond ring setting in Tiffany and Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:38 am
Some even invent their own little language to help conceal from police (or any eavesdroppers) the subject of their conversation.So, for example, Kevin Freeman and his co-conspirators say "iggidy" when they mean "ounce," "dove" to signify the number twenty, "diamond" to mean ten ounces of crack cocaine, and -- albeit less creatively -- "bread," "cheese," and "chips" to refer to money.Their novel "language"… [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
In November 2012, a customer alerted Tiffany that Costco was selling diamond engagement rings that she believed were being... [read post]
The district court’s judgment was vacated and the case remanded for trial (Tiffany and Company v. [read post]