Search for: "DICK v. ST. LOUIS-S" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
According to Jeffrey Tomich of the St. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Spicy IP) IP matters lead the way for India’s first e-court (Spicy IP) Copyright, arbitration and a feted film: Tandav Films v Four Frames (Spicy IP)   Israel Israel patent office goes green! [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
Louis School of Law: Social Scientific Research for Lawyers (Andrew D. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
The first conclusion was that Organized Baseball’s exemption from the federal antitrust laws most recently upheld in Toolson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 11:41 am by David Kopel
The Circuit Court’s opinion comes in a pair of cases: Wrenn v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Still, it would be foolish to reject Jennifer’s cautionary note tout court, just as it might be a mistake to adopt my old teacher Louis Hartz’s dismissal of Burke as an apostle of “mindless” complacence and acceptance of the status quo. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
In 1686 in Bristol, England, Sir John Knight carried a defensive gun into services at St. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
At various times, each of these deaths has been considered divine retribution. * 64 - 67: St Peter was executed by the Romans. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Hyde Park, MA; Remy Jules, President) Bens-Best-Deals S Corp. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]