Search for: "DIRECTV Holdings LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2022, 8:38 am
DirecTV, LLC. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:44 am
DIRECTV, LLC, 942 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2019). [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 10:31 am
DIRECTV, LLC, 838 F.3d 1253, 1258–59 (Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm
Diecast Marketing Innovations, LLC (In re Collecting Concepts), 2000 Bankr. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
DIRECTV, LLC, 942 F. 3d 1259, 1277 (CA11 2019). [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 8:37 am
DIRECTV, LLC, 838 F.3d 1253 (Fed. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:28 am
See,e.g., id. 1336–39; DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
DirecTV, LLC, 2019 WL 1767066, No. 18CV2559 (N.D. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 9:55 am
DirecTV, LLC, Case No. 15-CV-3755, 2018 WL 5919588 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
("MCI") did not provide coverage for an underlying action asserted by DirecTV, LLC ("DirecTV") against MCI. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:37 am
DIRECTV, LLC, 838F.3d 1253, 1262 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:09 pm
DIRECTV, LLC, 838 F.3d 1253, 1271 (Fed. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
DIRECTV, LLC, 838 F.3d 1253, 1271 (Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:01 pm
Editor’s Note: Jim Gill’s writing about eDiscovery and Data Management has been twice recognized with JD Supra Reader’s Choice Awards and he holds an MFA in Creative Writing from Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
DirecTV Group Holdings, LLC, Case No. 8:16-cv-1440-JLS-DFMx, has some interesting allegations. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm
DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
SAS Institute commenced inter partes proceedings to challenge the validity of claims in a patent issued to ComplementSoft LLC. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
(relisted after the April 13, April 21 and April 28 conferences) DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
§ 546(e) when a financial institution acts as a mere conduit for fraudulently transferred property, or whether instead the safe harbor applies only when the financial institution has its own beneficial interest in the transferred property; and (3) whether the 2nd Circuit correctly held — contrary to this court’s decisions holding that it is for Congress, and not the courts, to balance the multiple purposes of the Bankruptcy Code, and that courts must therefore rely first… [read post]
