Search for: "DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS V US" Results 81 - 100 of 1,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2014, 9:47 am by Daniel Nazer
Today EFF filed an amicus brief on this issue in a case called Williamson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:42 am by Drew Boortz
  If our legal system can be used to destroy the current status quo of standards-related industries, then either industry will need to come up with a new legal solution (escrowing the IP for blind distribution as determined by a neutral trustee?) [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the "first sale doctrine" cannot be used as a defense to a claim of copyright infringement where the defendant distributed copies in the U.S. of the plaintiff's works that were manufactured in a foreign country. [read post]
Another case where equal distribution was found to be appropriate was Miller v Miller, 513 NYS2d 764 (2nd Dept. 1987). [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:28 am by John P. Ahlers
" The judge rejected the government's argument that this was not a procurement action by the government and held that the Court of Federal claims has jurisdiction to hear the matter following the Federal Circuit's decision in Distributed Solutions v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
As Eric has covered here before, the court in Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games rejected similar infringement claims on the basis of de minimis use, implied license, and fair use. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
Epic argued that the relevant market should be aftermarkets of iOS app distribution and iOS in-app payment solutions rather than the mobile game transactions that the district court used. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:16 pm by Henry Sommer
A few weeks ago, Bob Lawless called the Supreme Court’s decision in Schwab v. [read post]