Search for: "DOES 1-68"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 3:02 pm
As a matter of fact several options could be possible: it could well be that the ED no longer upheld the lack of clarity objection but considered the lack of inventive step detrimental or that clarity and novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 was at stake, or even that only the amended description was not considered allowable. [8] This is at odds with the established jurisprudence that for the requirements of R 68(2) EPC 1973 to be fulfilled the decision must include, in logical… [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
Summary[7] In the board’s judgment, the reasons given in the decision under appeal do not conform with R 68 (2) EPC 1973 becau [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:53 am
The post How Big a Role Does Money Play in North Carolina’s Bail System? [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:39 am
Oakland Board of Education (083273) Is an employee alleging discrimination for failure to accommodate a disability, pursuant to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49, required to show an adverse employment action; and is this employee’s claim barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 to -146? [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:44 am
However, this resolution does not resolve any potential False Claims Act reviews by the Department of Justice. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:31 am
As the district court explained, Enzo II consistently refers to the “claims” at issue in that appeal, which extended beyond claim 1 to include claims 8, 67, 68, and 70. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm
Irrespective of whether its priority is valid or not, in particular as regards its claim 3 and Example C6, in the board’s view it does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 7:05 am
"Does inequality foster xenophobia? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
ii) What is s.13 of the 1977 Act for, and how does it work? [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 11:18 pm
Interestingly, while the Copyright Act fails to clarify what construes to be “commercial use”, the explanations to Rule 68 of the Copyright Rules, 2013 clarify three things:1) The royalty collected from enjoyment of the performer’s right in (i) to (v) of clause (a) of sub section (1) and proviso to sub. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
For the Financial Year 2021, Indian applicants comprised of 68% of H-1B registrations, followed by China with a share of around 13.2%; See also Number of Foreign College Students Staying and Working in U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:22 am
Looked at another way, those who feel employees have the advantage outweighed those with the opposite perspective by a more than 3:1 margin. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
’ (VR 7/31/2014 1:34:34).Huff v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:38 pm
United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1467-68 (Fed. [read post]
In Genesis Healthcare v. Symczyk, Supreme Court ducks actual mootness issue raised by Rule 68 offers
26 Apr 2013, 2:03 pm
Slip diss. op., at 1-2. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
See id. at 667-68. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
After the First Circuit reversed the dismissal of her lawsuit and remanded the case, a trial date was set for December 1, 2014. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:16 pm
The Rule 68 reasoning is also a case of first impression. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:54 am
First Nat'l Bank in Edinburg, 55 S.W.3d 58, 68 (Tex. [read post]