Search for: "DONALDSON v. MEANS" Results 61 - 80 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2013, 12:52 pm by RatnerPrestia
In re Donaldson confirmed that for a means-plus-function claim to be valid, appropriate “means” must be provided in the specification. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:01 am
Here is the abstract.In 1903, in Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing, Justice Holmes famously concluded that judges are ill-suited to make merit judgments when determining the eligibility for protection of works. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm by Anubha Sinha
They relied on a Delhi HC decision( New Delhi Television Limited v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
In Case T‑396/11, ultra air v OHIM - Donaldson Filtration Deutschland, the General Court examined the applicability of the concept of 'abuse of rights', in relation to an application for a declaration of invalidity of a Community trade mark, under Articles 56(1)(a), 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am by Terry Hart
Within a century of the decision, the U.S. would confront issues of common law copyright in Wheaton and Donaldson v Peters. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:28 am by Richard Mumford
That decision affirmed the existence of the “great safety net” of the inherent jurisdiction (a term coined by Lord Donaldson in In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC 1) in relation to all vulnerable adults. [read post]