Search for: "DRC v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:30 am
Circuit found that the Rule (and Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act) violated the First Amendment “to the extent [they] require regulated entities to report to the [SEC] and to state on their website that any of their products have ‘not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am
The case is National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:18 am
Snodgrass v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm
But a two-judge majority upon panel rehearing in the conflict minerals case hewed closely to its earlier opinion, although it offered a second basis for its decision in order to account for the AMI case.As a result, the SEC’s rule and the Dodd-Frank Act provision are unconstitutional to the extent they require regulated entities to report to the Commission and to state on their website that any of their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
Kathy Joan Copas v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:30 pm
Maine Human Rights Commission et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:30 am
Kitazato v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 7:00 pm
Tomorrow, Monday, June 1, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court will hear argument on a defense motion in Prosecutor v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
These minerals currently include gold, tin, tatalum, tungsten, and may include any other mineral the Secretary of State determines is being used to finance conflict in the DRC or an adjoining country. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:47 pm
Judge Rao's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 6:20 am
Executions in California were suspended in 2006 after a federal district court in Morales v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:02 am
Meat Inst. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
The first is a Blakely v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:59 am
., v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm
Attribution has been insisted on by the International Court of Justice in its decisions in the Nicaragua, Palestinian Wall, and DRC v Uganda cases; Trapp discusses the ICJ’s jurisprudence in some detail. [read post]
31 May 2008, 12:00 pm
Kerry only took state by 3%. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
Circuit to rehear the case in light of the outcome of an unrelated First Amendment lawsuit, American Meat Institute v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:33 am
In this matter the respondent creditor of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is seeking to enforce arbitration awards against the assets of the appellant mining company owned by the DRC. [read post]
