Search for: "Daniel Deacon"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Deacon and Leah M. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:34 pm
Here is the rundown (in chronological order) with links to the reviews and the underlying papers: Mila Sohoni, Form And Substance In The New Major Questions Doctrine, JOTWELL (January 12, 2023) (reviewing Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Virginia L. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Va. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:30 pm
. Daniel Deacon is an assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:35 am
PRESENTERS & COMMENTERS Cristina Isabel Ceballos, Curbing the President’s Power Over Criminal Administrative LawCommenter: Peter Strauss Elena Chachko, Toward Regulatory Protectionism: The International Elements of Agency PowerCommenter: Michael Sant’Ambrogio Emily Chertoff, Systemic Agency Enforcement ChallengesCommenter: Glen Staszewski Lunch Time Speaker:Kathleen Claussen (co-author Kristin Blankely), Alternative Adjudication Dan… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Daniel Free 47. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:59 am
Daniel Deacon and Leah Litman have criticized the “new” major questions doctrine’s reliance on political controversy as a sign of a major question, contending that it will empower political minorities to amend enacted legislation granting broad statutory authority de facto. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Virginia L. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Speakers: Daniel Deacon (Michigan); Leah M. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:29 am
LemleyThe New Major Questions Doctrine by Leah Litman & Daniel Deacon (Virginia Law Review forthcoming)Delegation at the Founding: A Response to the Critics by Julian Davis Mortenson & Nicholas Bagley (Columbia Law Review forthcoming)Testing Textualism’s ‘Ordinary Meaning’ by Tara Leigh Grove (90 George Washington Law Review 101 (2022))The National Security Consequences of the Major Questions Doctrine by Timothy Meyer & Ganesh Sitaraman (122 Michigan… [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Daniel Deacon (University of Michigan Law School) & Leah Litman (University of Michigan Law School) have posted The New Major Questions Doctrine on SSRN. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
In a draft article, Leah Litman, assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School, and Daniel Deacon, a lecturer at the University of Michigan Law School, argued that the Supreme Court has interpreted the major questions doctrine as requiring explicit congressional authorization of agency policies, regardless of the plain meaning of the applicable statute. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
Daniel C. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
I’m inclined to agree with Daniel Deacon that this “little bit wrong” rule is unsound. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:42 am
" Daniel Deacon and Leah Litman have this post at the "Take Care" blog. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
A Workplace Law Preview” from Fisher & Phillips “In Focus: Clinton, Trump Spar over Jobs in First Debate” by SHRM’s Dana Wilkie and Allen Smith “Hillary, or The Donald: A voting guide for employers” by Employment & Labor Insider‘s Robin Shea “Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Economy” by The Wall Street Journal‘s Nick Timiraos and Richard Rubin “The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Election… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
A Workplace Law Preview” from Fisher & Phillips “In Focus: Clinton, Trump Spar over Jobs in First Debate” by SHRM’s Dana Wilkie and Allen Smith “Hillary, or The Donald: A voting guide for employers” by Employment & Labor Insider‘s Robin Shea “Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Economy” by The Wall Street Journal‘s Nick Timiraos and Richard Rubin “The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Election… [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:43 am
(See also Daniel v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Daniel C. [read post]
