Search for: "Daniels v. Williams" Results 361 - 380 of 1,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner assert that the removal would be improper if it was done for improper motives: namely “personal, pecuniary, or purely partisan ends. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts We understand the cases of Ellis v Wigan Council and Williams v London Borough of Croydon both settled in advance of the trials listed for 6 December 2017. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
And Orin Kerr discussed four considerations to supplement his amicus brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
On Monday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Velte, Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop V. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am by Lyle Denniston
The case is named for the former commander of U.S. forces in South Vietnam, General William C. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings The Ohio Commercial Activity Tax, a 0.26 percent tax on business gross receipts above $1 million, is a throwback to an earlier era of taxation, bringing back a tax type that had been in steady retreat for nearly a century. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 3:23 am by Robin Shea
The EEOC will reverse its current position on LGBT rights, similar to what the Trump Department of Justice did recently in the pending Second Circuit case of Zarda v. [read post]