Search for: "Darby v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
The court dismissed the legal malpractice complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), based on documentary evidence from which it concluded that the state of the law at the time the advice was given was unsettled and defendants therefore had not " failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession'" at that time (quoting Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 313… [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Darby (1987) 33 Ohio St. 3d 32. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 6:04 am
The full court opinion is available here Richardson v Wal-Mart (9/9/16). [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
Darby, 2000 OK 1 (nonprecedential) (hospital); Cox Enterprises v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
Initially, it is noted that inasmuch as the Plaintiff has admitted that the Attorney Defendants' sole role in the transaction was to act as her closing attorney and to assist her in acquiring title to both properties, this Court finds that this transaction was a garden variety real estate transaction that does not require the Attorney Defendants on the instant motions to furnish expert affidavits to establish that they did not breach any standard of professional care (Darby &… [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:18 am
This is the alternative holding of United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
” With regard to plaintiff’s account stated claim, defendant asserted, without corroboration, that she had objected to the invoices at various points, but those “self-serving, bald allegations of oral protests were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated” (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]; accord Schlenker v Cascino, 124 AD3d at 1153). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941). . . . [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
I think that the interpretations being offered of Article V make an already dreadful article even worse. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm
They cite U.S. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:31 pm
The first is United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
In McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:27 am
The most appropriate limit on Congress' enumerated powers was stated 193 years ago by Chief Justice John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Darby (1941) Wickard v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:46 am
. *** Pretrial hearings continue in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
U.S. officials had delayed al-Darbi’s transfer, previously set for Feb. [read post]
