Search for: "Daubert v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2016, 7:18 am
In Daubert v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:44 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Daubert v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Daubert v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Daubert v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Daubert v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:01 am
9thCircuit-Seal_svg.png Ninth Circuit notes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying request for a pretrial Daubert hearing, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
In aggravated sexual abuse of a child trial, trial court was not required to hold a Daubert reliability hearing before admitting expert testimony by a university professor of pediatrics concerning the characteristics of minor victims of abuse; trial court has discretion to decide whether a Daubert hearing is required, in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
In 1993, in Daubert v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 1:14 am
In drug conspiracy trial, no error in admitting expert testimony by expert witness with extensive training in fingerprinting, without first conducting a Daubert hearing, because a foundation of his training and experience was established before the witness offered an opinion about fingerprints on containers at the searched residence and his fingerprint analysis was peer-reviewed by a nationally recognized fingerprint examiner, in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
1894Letter.jpg Seventh Circuit holds that the district court was not required to conduct any Daubert analysis before considering handwriting expert testimony during a suppression hearing on whether the defendant's signature appeared on a consent form, in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 11:33 am
United States, 193 F.3d 1361, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
ISP Technologies, Inc., 259 F.3d 924, 929 (8th Cir. 2001) (emphasis added), but “[t]here is less need for the gatekeeper to keep the gate when the gatekeeper is keeping the gate only for himself,” United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:17 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” (March 5, 2012) <downloaded on March 25, 2012>. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
Trask v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 6:21 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
