Search for: "Dave Hoffman" Results 81 - 100 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by SHG
  Back in 2007, Dave Hoffman questioned whether the blogosphere was stagnant. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:03 pm by Michael Kang
  This is just a version of the “unraveling of the market” that Dave Hoffman cited to explain why the spring cycle itself seemed to be creeping up earlier and earlier. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:43 am by Walter Olson
Related: Dave Hoffman on what would happen if we freed up 2 million law student hours a year [ConcurOp]; Ross Davies/Journal of Law, PDF, via Bainbridge on when legal scholarship helps judges. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm by Sona Makker
In the recent book “The Startup of You” authors Ben Casnocha and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman introduce the idea of “permanent beta”: We are all works in progress. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:50 pm by Dan Markel
Via Dave Hoffman's post having to do with the questionable utility of non-elite journal experience for law students, I came across our own Matt Bodie's spirited defense of student participation in the legal scholarship world. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:03 pm by Walter Olson
” [Kyle Graham] Jim Chen and others review Brian Tamanaha’s new book Failing Law Schools [Paul Caron, TaxProf; earlier including my Liberty and Law symposium entry with Chen and Tamanaha] “After law school deregulation” [Dave Hoffman, ConcurOp] “Five Ways To Mitigate the Crisis In Legal Education” [bring in more practitioner/adjuncts, dump the library requirements; Andrew Trask, Class Strategist] Since Prof. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by SHG
  And Hoffman is just laughing his butt off at me. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:08 pm by Deven Desai
Dave Hoffman and Salil Mehra’s Wikitruth Through Wikiorder is fascinating paper on how Wikipedia and one type of commons works. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:28 pm by Dan Markel
If you like it, think of it as a contribution to the Dave Hoffman genre of blawging. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Dave Hoffman posts an exchange of letters between photographer Annie Leibovitz and Jan Wenner, editor and publisher of Rolling Stone, and asks whether they create a valid contract. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Dave Hoffman posts an exchange of letters between photographer Annie Leibovitz and Jan Wenner, editor and publisher of Rolling Stone, and asks whether they create a valid contract. [read post]
27 May 2012, 6:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
  Chip Reid, Anthony Mason, Dave Edelstein (sadly repeated a second time by Osgood). [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:29 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 9th Circuit, Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Dave Hoffman, Deaths, Federal Judges, Feeder Judges, James Browning, James R. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:48 am by SHG
  Via Ilya Somin at Volokh Conspiracy: Both Dave Hoffman and Orin Kerr have recently suggested that some of the liberal legal commentators who claimed that the individual mandate was a slam dunk case for the government were doing so for the purposes of “shaping the narrative” about the case, and may not have actually believed what they said. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:41 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Both Dave Hoffman and Orin Kerr have recently suggested that some of the liberal legal commentators who claimed that the individual mandate was a slam dunk case for the government were doing so for the purposes of “shaping the narrative” about the case, and may not have actually believed what they said. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:21 am by Paul Horwitz
Dave Hoffman has an interesting post at CoOp titled "Motivated Cognition and the Mandate," about the nature of legal blog posts about the ACA argument last week. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:11 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Yesterday, Dave Hoffman at Concurring Opinions characterized my cobloggers and me as  ”engaging in victory lap devoted to the proposition ‘We were right and you were wrong, and the fact that you didn’t predict our being right demonstrates that you are particularly close-minded. [read post]