Search for: "Davenport v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]  Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name:  Davenport v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v Garmin Int’l,… [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Davenport, 20-826, which involved the test for determining whether the constitutional error of shackling a murder defendant in court was harmless. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am by Zack Bluestone, Chris Mirasola
Taiwanese Deputy Foreign Minister Bruce Linghu announced a media tour of Taiping (Itu Aba), which took place on Wednesday, as part of a larger diplomatic blitz in advance of the upcoming merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:26 am by Joseph McClelland
Kachwalla, 274 Ga. 886, 561 SE2d 403 (2002)]; • Court need not charge jury “incapable of driving safely” language in a “less safe”case [State v. [read post]