Search for: "Davey v. Davey"
Results 61 - 80
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2016, 2:54 am
Max Kennerly has a detailed analysis of legal issues in the coming Hogan v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:44 am
If you do get it, you would join this very impressive list of past directors: Valerie Hughes Bruce Wilson Pieter Jan Kuijper Bill Davey Frieder Roessler Ake Linden [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:37 am
However, given the votes of Justices Breyer and Ginsburg in Locke v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am
Batty v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
In Locke v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:15 pm
Davey Alba at Wired reports and quotes me on several aspects. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:45 am
According to the 6th Circuit in Wheat v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
We can’t end without noting the utter gibberish pronounced by Tory councillor and housing committee chair, Tom Davey: “No change is not an option. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:29 am
It compared the case to Locke v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:22 pm
Davey (2004), and what sorts violate the Free Exercise Clause? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:06 pm
Van Wagner Boston, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:59 am
The post Cannot undertake to the FTT to patch up bad work by Francis Davey appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious purpose, and (v) does not… [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Davey, Esq., and Matthew J. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
See generally Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, and Douglas Altman, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2001). [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
The Illinois court factually distinguished Galaviz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:56 pm
There is an earlier case called Botteril v Hampstead Garden Suburb LRX/135/2007, which had taken a different approach. [read post]
