Search for: "David Freeman Engstrom"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 8:57 am
David Freeman Engstrom (Stanford Law School) has posted 'Not Merely There to Help the Men': Equal Pay Laws, Collective Rights, and the Making of the Modern Class Action (70 Stanford Law Review __ (2018, Forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
David Freeman Engstrom, Stanford Law School, has posted two papers on the history of class actions. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
Nora Freeman Engstrom David Engel’s recent book, The Myth of the Litigious Society, has its roots in a piece published over two decades ago, by UCLA’s Richard Abel. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
” In an essay in the Stanford Law Review Online, David Freeman Engstrom and Jonah Gelbach discuss California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Novak (2013) (also available in Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it edited by Daniel Carpenter and David Moss) (providing a critical look at the emergence of regulatory capture in the United States) Corralling Capture by David Freeman Engstrom (2013) (calling for more rigor in how we define and frame the issue of regulatory capture) Enlightened Regulatory Capture by David Thaw (2014) (exploring how regulatory… [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, although “both parties quickly claimed victory, in reality the decision is likely to satisfy no one and to raise as many questions as it answers”; Richard Samp, who at the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse concludes that, although the… [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
Commentary on the case comes from David Freeman Engstrom, who in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required) describes the case as “notable because it embodies much of what’s wrong with how we as a society talk about, and our elected leaders debate, the role of lawyers and litigation in our system of government. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
Article. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:17 pm
The title of this post comes from this essay by Professor David Freeman Engstrom, the abstract of which states: This brief essay introduces the Stanford Law Review issue accompanying the symposium, “The Civil Rights Act at Fifty,” convened at Stanford... [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:30 am
David Freeman Engstrom, Harnessing the Private Attorney General: Evidence from Qui Tam Litigation, 112 Colum. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:30 am
David Freeman Engstrom, Agencies as Litigation Gatekeepers, 123 Yale L. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:08 am
Stanford professor David Freeman Engstrom has pursued that argument to its logical extreme in his epic (97-page) Yale Law Journal article Agencies as Gatekeepers. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:08 am
Stanford professor David Freeman Engstrom has pursued that argument to its logical extreme in his epic (97-page) Yale Law Journal article Agencies as Gatekeepers. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
David Freeman Engstrom, Stanford Law School, has posted Corralling Capture, which appears in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 36 (2013). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[Blogger's note: Today's post is authored jointly by Angelo A. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:06 am
David Freeman Engstrom of Stanford Law School has posted on SSRN his essay, "The Twiqbal Puzzle and Empirical Study of Civil Procedure. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:57 am
Article. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm
Just read David Freeman Engstrom’s super-interesting empirical paper Harnessing the Private Attorney General: Evidence from Qui TamLitigation, which has implications for hiring private firms to assist AGs in consumer protection cases as well. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:53 pm
"The Lost Origins of American Fair Employment Law: Regulatory Choice and the Making of Modern Civil Rights, 1943-1972, published by David Freeman Engstrom (Stanford--Law) in the current volume of the Stanford Law Review (Volume 63, no. 5, May 2011), may be of interest to readers of this blog. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:00 am
The Lost Origins of American Fair Employment Law: Regulatory Choice and the Making of Modern Civil Rights, 1943-1972, has just been posted by David Freeman Engstrom, Stanford Law School. [read post]
