Search for: "David H. Blunt" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2017, 1:30 pm by Russell Spivak
Guantanamo Bay detainee Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi’s protracted legal battle has filled the pages of Lawfare for quite some time—see here, here, here, and here—and for good reason: Al-Alwi’s case presents delicate legal questions that touch on myriad themes in national security. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  But successful implementation requires drawing a more nuanced line between compliance-oriented tasks and discretion-oriented tasks, not employing a blunt tool industrywide. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:13 am by J.E. Alvarez
Alvarez In the same month that I traveled to Barcelona, I went to Paris to attend a conference organized by Paris I Professors Emmanuelle Jouannet and Hélène Ruiz Fabri and Professor Mark Toufayan of the University of Ottawa. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Claimants included the Duchess of York, James Blunt, Christopher Eccleston,Uri Geller and Hugh Grant, as reported by Press Gazette. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 4:36 pm by David Lat
[H]e would have felt pressure to build consensus on the Court if he had become chief justice. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Also see --- > Consumer contracts at the back end (when consumers are sued on debt)The utilization of the quantitative approach in surveying the current legal landscape dotted with common-law courts has been subject of some criticism, but the notion of a “majority” view is necessarily a quantitative concept and so is the concept of “trends”, which adds the dimension of time as a directional variable to blunt measures of frequency of occurrences within a given span… [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Schachtman
These omissions substantially blunted Huh’s criticisms. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
*This is the seventh post in a symposium on William Novak’s New Democracy: The Creation of the Modern American State. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Nicholas Eisenberger & David Gottesman, Harvard Business Publishing, December 7, 2009 There are plenty of reasons to be disappointed with the Copenhagen climate talks that start today: the meeting will not result in a binding agreement, the timeframe for such an agreement is potentially years away, and of course, neither the US nor China has committed to binding reductions. [read post]