Search for: "David Luban"
Results 161 - 180
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 10:27 am
Dodge, and David Luban. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 8:54 pm
I suspect that May’s readers may be equally inclined to abandon the idea of genocide as a meaningful legal concept, or perhaps to agree with David Luban that the concept of genocide must extend beyond group destruction to include all large scale massacres that are currently proscribed by the crime against humanity of extermination. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:42 am
Luban, David. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 12:00 am
Gottleib’s book was also reviewed in the New Yorker and the NYRB.In the NYRB, David Luban reviews Free Speech: Ten Principles for a Connected World by Timothy Garton Ash. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
David Luban posited that the obligations of the lawyer’s role cannot excuse immoral conduct. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:53 pm
David Luban is the Frederick Haas Professor of Law and Philosophy at Georgetown University's Law Center and Department of Philosophy. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:47 am
For example, I think the perspective of David Luban, or of Bill Simon, would tend to orientate more towards decision in context than towards the application of a rule across circumstances. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 5:55 am
It is an impressive set of thoughtful essays by the likes of David Dyzenhaus, Frederick Schauer, David Luban, Joseph Vining and many others. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
David Luban has written a remarkable post on the intellectual bankruptcy of the hypothetical, but that, of course, doesn't lessen the likelihood one whit that one of the bloviators--perhaps George Stephanopalous seeking to assure his audience that he's not a Democratic hack--will ask the question. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Other scholars, most notably David Luban, accept constraints of legality, but also insist that lawyers’ actions are limited by the norms of ordinary morality. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am
” My correspondent is referring to this piece I wrote back in June, along with more recent follow-ups after the election, this debate on the subject between David Luban and Daniel Byman, as well as related material on Just Security (see pieces by Luban, Oona Hathaway, and David Kaye). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:01 pm
(Thanks to my colleague and co-blogger David Luban for bringing the Améry to my attention.) [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” Briefly: At Balkinization, Marty Lederman and David Luban weigh in on the government’s cert petition in Hargan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
I would define cause lawyers, to paraphrase David Luban, as lawyers who hold themselves morally accountable for the ends they pursue on behalf of clients. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:04 am
Fourth, notice that people like Wasserstrom, Gerald Dworkin, David Luban, and even our own Brad Wendel and Alice Woolley (not to mention our commenter extraorinaire Patrick O'Donnell), to name just a few, have special insights about the ethical justifications for lawyering that they might not have about, say, the law of retail commerce. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:09 am
David Luban’s thoughtful essay on the morality of targeted killing in the Boston Review last week is among the more balanced pieces I’ve come across on the topic, and unquestionably worth reading. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
Among prominent commentators, David Luban (int'l humanitarian law), Scott Horton (law of warfare), and Jack Balkin (con law) have this expertise, but I really don't. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
David Donoghue. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:09 pm
Luban, David. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm
This isn't an original point with me -- David Wilkins and David Luban have both made it powerfully -- but it still goes relatively unappreciated. [read post]
