Search for: "David Merrell"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Ehrlich, Ronac Mamtani, Warren Bilker, David J. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, a United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, in which the Supreme Court established the standards for the use of expert and scientific evidence in federal courts. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
Antic proposals abound in the legal analysis of expert witness opinion evidence. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 643 F. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:48 am
David L. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over a decade ago, Professor David Faigman asked whether science was different for lawyers. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
App. 2006); David v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
In several posts, I have addressed isolated issues in Professor Margaret Berger’s introductory chapter to the third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (RMSE 3d). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
In assessing an association for causality, the starting point is “an association between two variables, perfectly clear-cut and beyond what we would care to attribute to the play of chance. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
Id. 4 See e.g., David L. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 584 A.2d 1383, 1386088 (Pa. 1991). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm
See generally David E. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am
In another case, Judge David G. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
David Chiaradio was indicted on two counts of possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2022, 10:28 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), the Supreme Court explained that Rule 702 imposes an obligation on a trial court to act as gatekeeper, to ensure that any and all scientific [or technical or otherwise specialized] testimony or evidence admitted is not only relevant, but reliable. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
David F. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
David E. [read post]
