Search for: "Davis v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IAM) USPTO Director’s blog (Just an Examiner) USPTO job opening: Deputy Commissioner for Patent Policy (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) New patent search tool Xyggy Patent – search for similar patents using known patents as the query (Patent Baristas) Patent Office announces that registered practitioners not required to pay annual maintenance fee for FY 2009 (Patent Docs) Want to improve patent… [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
Hiniker, 150 F.3d at 1367.Under the statute at issue in Hiniker, reexaminationcould only be instituted if the Commissioner determinedthat there was “a substantial new question of patentability,”i.e., new prior art not considered by the examiner. 35U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/UKLGwUZy3e -> Chevron Corp v. [read post]
