Search for: "Davis v. County of Jefferson, Al*" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Davis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Davis v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In order to proceed in any individual capacity, a shareholder “must allege something more than wrong to the corporate body” (Davis v. [read post]