Search for: "Davis v. Multiple Access, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
All in all, the plaintiff had no access to running water for around 17 hours, went without any shower or access to soap for around 30 hours, and remained in “soiled” clothing for about 23 hours. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The SEC recently proposed a set of sweeping equity market structure reforms across four rule proposals that would make highly significant changes to how national market system (NMS) stock orders are priced, executed and reported. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Richard Hunt
Davi, LLC, 2:21-CV-00273-MCE-DB, 2022 WL 256867, at *5 (E.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
It will enable easy access and use of millions of documents for multi-disciplinary research. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
Simonson Station Stores, Inc., and Bemidji Mgt. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]