Search for: "Davis v. Muse"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
What we do know is that Speaker Bill Davis apparently does not have a bank account, or has not reported one, which is perhaps unsurprising for someone whose name is a conveniently untraceable alias. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The theory, about which I have written extensively on this site, most recently here, emanates most directly from the musings of three Justices in the (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in its 2019 Rucho v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
See Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:00 am
Davis Construction Corporation v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Just two days after President Trump’s April 28 musings, the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:30 am
Montana v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, aptly described by the chief justice “as a Justice with extensive experience in state and local politics,” recognized this fact almost 40 years ago, writing in Davis v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
On the other hand, both Erwin and Geof were very clear to highlight the ways in which university authorities can and should protect individuals from true threats, from harassment (which has a legal definition focused on how targeted and persistent a particular course of offensive expressive conduct is) and from defamation.Three of us then mused about why many (most?) [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
Maybe I’d put Angela Davis, If They Come in the Morning (1971) into this category. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
The Supreme Court term that began Monday marks the sixth year that we have regularly wasted the time of SCOTUSblog readers with our musings on the Supreme Court’s “Shadow Docket”; even before that, we detracted from the Internet’s exclusive focus on the Kardashians, hate speech, and porn with our intermittent musings on relisted cases. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Mismatch 101—Basic Assertions Justice Scalia’s musings were no doubt poorly worded. [read post]
