Search for: "Davis v. Pierce"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Barajas, University of California, Davis Regulators must redress transportation inequities in rural and disadvantaged communities. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
For example, in Thomas v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:03 am
Similarly, the third edition of the leading administrative law treatise stated in 1994 that “[t]raditionally, a circuit court vacated a rule whenever it concluded that the agency action was arbitrary and capricious” (Davis & Pierce, § 7.4). [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 7:33 am
Davies, eds., The Black Book of Justice Holmes: Text Transcript and Commentary [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm
Grier, Noah Swayne, and David Davis. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 10:30 pm
”); see also Davis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a working paper, Mason Marks, professor at University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law, and I. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
Davis offered Westrick the job of Director of Research of SCBA, which Westrick accepted. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Susan Danzig et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am
Davis J. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
