Search for: "Davis v. Thomas" Results 21 - 40 of 1,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Barajas, University of California, Davis Regulators must redress transportation inequities in rural and disadvantaged communities. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
Thomas of Maryland, “safe to be trusted with the destinies of a great nation and of an injured and magnanimous people. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Thomas, 458 U.S. 259, 261 (1982) (per curiam) (stating that “the justification to conduct . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]