Search for: "Davis v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
United States A Florida judge has denied an attempt by the former T-Mobile chief executive John Legere to dismiss a $100m defamation suit brought again [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
As we have noted in prior client updates, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have increasingly adopted an aggressive enforcement posture for sanctions violations. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Justice Lee stated that the evidence may change the outcome of the case and extends beyond Lehrmann’s credibility. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
” The regulator found that programmes presented by Jacob Rees-Mogg, Esther McVey and Philip Davies were news segments that which had no “exceptional justification. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
Under Trump, explains the Mandate for Leadership, the Department of Justice should prosecute drug manufacturers and providers who supply abortion pills. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am
Antitrust enforcers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are intensifying their scrutiny of algorithm-related collusion, propelled by cases such as RealPage and McKenna Duffy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
" It is even possible that the Trump Justice Department will vigorously argue that the President is not covered by Section 3. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
The reason, quite simply, is that these transactions did not result in a liquidation, in whole or in part, of the camp business”]; and Dukas v Davis Aircraft Prods. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
United States, a case with potentially broad implications for the income tax system. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Although the actual decision was unanimous, four justices argued that the majority’s new test is too narrow and will negatively affect water quality and flood control in the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
" If Justice Scalia's approach controls, then the Jefferson Davis Horrible is irrelevant: if the presidency is not an "Office . . . under the United States," then Jefferson Davis could have become President. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
