Search for: "De Jordan v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Cody M. Poplin
” The United States has also pledged $139 million in humanitarian aid for Yemen. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:00 am by EEM
""Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing Therapy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Yet the allies are united at the United Nations, where the United States, France, Britain and Germany have urged the Security Council to investigate Iran's ballistic missile test from last week, which they argue violated the terms of a 2010 UNSC resolution banning Iran from conducting such tests. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The floor goes to the CJEU | Is Michael Jordan’s ”Jumpman” logo a copyright infringement? [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
The floor goes to the CJEU | Is Michael Jordan’s ”Jumpman” logo a copyright infringement? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by NCC Staff
Senator and Irish peace negotiator 1997 CNN International  1996 King Hussein I of Jordan and former Prime Minister of IsraelShimon Peres 1995 Sadako Ogata, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 1994 Václav Havel, President of the Czech Republic 1993 F.W. de Klerk, President of South Africa* and Nelson Mandela, President of the African National Congress* 1992 Thurgood Marshall, U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Moving into second place with four post-record relists is Jordan v. not *that* Fisher, 14-8035, which asks (1) whether it is error to deny a habeas petitioner a certificate of appealability in a case in which the state supreme court was divided and another federal court of appeals would recognize the claim; and (2) whether the fact that the prosecutor did not expand the sentence to which the defendant was exposed prohibits a finding of prosecutorial vindictiveness. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
United States The Minnesota Court of Appeals has held that the state’s criminal libel law which allows for punishment of up to one year imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $3,000 for libellous statements is unconstitutionally overboard. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]