Search for: "Dean v. Davis"
Results 281 - 300
of 442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The Senate has announced that when it convenes later this month for the second impeachment trial of former President Donald J. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
I find the start of each academic year invariably invigorating. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And even before the Amendment many women were more or less protected against sexual discrimination in voting in many U.S. states, especially those in the far West.)As the dean of its flagship public law school, I am proud that Illinois was the very first state to ratify the suffrage-and-sex amendment. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:36 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills analyzes the implications of last week’s decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Davis, and whose expansive views about equal protection are exemplified by his willingness in Frontiero v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:43 am
Dean of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:31 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Roberts and Alito also were with Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas in Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
HIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
