Search for: "Defense Supplies Corp. v. United States Lines Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
On Jan. 16, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Again, there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of the Government: that the submission of defective cost or pricing data causes a dollar-for-dollar increase in the contract price.[13] Contractors have rebutted this presumption where the defective cost or pricing data were irrelevant or unusable[14] and where the contractor passed on the full benefits of an undisclosed discount.[15] Contractor Defenses TINA prohibits contractors from asserting certain defenses to… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Marine Corps, who served as an infantry officer for 25 years and commanded combat units in Iraq. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Associates First Capital Corp. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
MANE FL CORP., Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Compare In re NVIDIA Corp. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Co., 2021 U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Co., 2021 U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988). [9] See Memorandum of Law in support of Defendant General Electric Company’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, in DeVries v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
Three justices, in dissent, would have applied a bright-line bare metal defense, as contended for by petitioners.[4] The majority eschewed both the invariant bare metal defense and the Third Circuit’s infinitely flexible forseeability test, for a “third way. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
