Search for: "Delfino v. Agilent Technologies" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Employer Not Liable for Employee's Threatening Emails Per 47 USC 230--Delfino v. Agilent
2 Jan 2007, 4:24 pm
By Eric Goldman Delfino v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Employers Pick Up Another Defense for Employee's Computer Antics
15 Dec 2006, 8:59 am
Delfino v. [read post]
Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer - http://employerslawyer.blogspot.com/
Employer immune under Section 230 in suit over employee conduct
18 Dec 2006, 10:17 pm
[Also covered at IP Law Observer] Delfino v. [read post]
Internet Cases - http://blog.internetcases.com
Policies: Love Them, Hate Them, part 2
11 Jan 2007, 4:49 pm
  In a recent California court of appeal case, Delfino v. [read post]
The General Counsel Blog - http://blog.thegeneralcounsel.net
More Defendants Lose 230 Defense
5 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
I think this is the right result, but it would have been nice to see the court discuss Delfino v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Do the FTC's New Advertising Guidelines Run Afoul of Section 230?
16 Oct 2009, 11:20 am
Agilent Technologies, 145 Cal. [read post]
Consumer Law & Policy Blog - http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/
Court holds employers not liable for employee defamatory online speech made using employer computers. Plaintiffs can’t take the money and run!
2 Jul 2014, 8:43 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Agilent Technologies, Inc., 52 Cap.Rptr.3d 376 (Ca. [read post]
Employer Law Report - http://www.employerlawreport.com/
The Misunderstood World of Defamation Law
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Wong v. [read post]
The Gomez Firm Personal Injury Blog - http://www.thegomezfirm.com/blog/
Court Says Uber and Lyft Drivers May be Employees
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
. __ Most interestingly, both judges were completely unreceptive to Uber’s and Lyft’s arguments that they are merely platform/technology companies and not car companies. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/