Search for: "Department of Commerce v. United States House of Representatives" Results 21 - 40 of 331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
House Energy and Commerce Committee, introduced H.R. 7116, the “Do Not Disturb Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Adam Chan
With almost all of Congress’s legislative powers contained in Article I (commerce, taxing, spending, war powers, patent-granting power, etc.), this represented a dramatic limitation. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Testimony for the United States House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary The Tax Foundation is pleased to submit this written testimony. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
MacCracken, Jr., a lawyer and former assistant secretary of commerce for aeronautics (the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:38 pm by Samir B. Dahman
What should Athletes and College Athletics Departments do in the wake of NCAA v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Trade policy is formulated in two congressional subcommittees, in the Ways and Means Committee of the House of Representatives and in the Finance Committee of the Senate. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am by Marty Lederman
  Id.In the ordinary course, then, Trump would do what every President before him has done:  transmit to Congress the Commerce Department’s census calculations of the numbers of total State residents as of the previous April 1, and calculate House seat apportionments based upon those state population numbers. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 8:52 am by Gene Quinn
Before that, he worked in the Bush White House and Commerce Department on patent reform and IP issues. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 8:52 am by Gene Quinn
Before that, he worked in the Bush White House and Commerce Department on patent reform and IP issues. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The dissenting views in the House impeachment report, for example, claim that “the President’s assertion of valid constitutional privileges is being used as a weapon against him,” and that the House’s decision to “rush[] straight to impeachment without engaging the courts to resolve this interbranch dispute” represents “a strategic choice … not an appropriate justification for impeachment. [read post]