Search for: "Department of Educ. v. Mr. and Mrs. S." Results 1 - 20 of 527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by INFORRM
It has been announced that the President of the King’s Bench Division has appointed Mrs Justice Steyn DBE and Mrs Justice Collins Rice DBE as the Judges Jointly in Charge of the Media and Communications (MAC) List. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
Mrs I as carer relied upon her children’s right to reside. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The one department to be enriched and where fully qualified people were appointed for the purpose of its flourishing is the Department of Defense.With the swipe of a pen, he rolled back regulation after regulation trying to make the Departments of Education and Energy and the EPA disappear. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:05 pm by Jim Gerl
You may read the Justice Department's brief here.Unfortunately, on Monday of this week, the Supremes denied certiorari in the case of  Ridley Sch Dist v MR by Parents, Docket No. 13-1547  By declining to consider the decision, the high court lets the ruling stand. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
It is generally accepted that the more a decision lies in the “macro-political” field the less intrusive will be the court’s supervision (R v Secretary of State for Education, ex p. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
NYC Board of Education and the UFT agreement addressing the processing of disciplinary charges filed against an educator pursuant to §3020-aThe following is the letter from NYC Department of Education Chancellor Klein to United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew concerning the processing of disciplinary charges filed against a New York City Department of Education educator pursuant to §3020-a of the… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Decisions involving an employee’s use of the employer's electronic equipment that resulted in disciplinary action being taken against an employee [Internet links highlighted in color]Sprague v Spokane Valley Fire Department Sprague v. [read post]