Search for: "Department of Employment v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 09-837 (2011), the Supreme Court faced the issue of whether a Treasury Department rule (discussed below) is valid. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Appellate Courts differ regarding the State’s reduction of its employer contribution towards health insurance premiums for certain State retireesBransten v State of New York, 117 AD3d 455 Retired Pub. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
However, while the case was pending, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that speech made pursuant to an employee's official duties could no longer be the basis of that employee's claim. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida has preliminarily enjoined the Department of Labor (DOL) from enforcing its Temporary Non-Agricultural Employment of H–2B Aliens in the United States rule published last February and that was scheduled to become effective today. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
See also United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:04 am
O’Neal is a wage-and-hour consultant with forty years of experience working in the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:28 am
Last week, in Matter of Cale v Commissioner of Labor, 2007 NY Slip Op 09850, the Third Department held that if the professional position is eliminated by the employer the TN visa holder may not receive New York State unemployment insurance benefits. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:27 am
United States Dep’t of Labor, 20-CV-3020 (JPO), 2020 WL 4462260 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:11 am
The Respondent was granted six months of visitor status, but did not depart the United States when his status expired. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:16 am
, we reported that the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in City of Ontario v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
"The Coque decision further evidences the erosion in New York of the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:51 pm
United States (Indian Commerce Clause)Whiteagle v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
Dohme v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 5:58 am
State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:49 pm
To read the full text of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Christopher v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
By Little V. [read post]
