Search for: "Department of Employment v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 4,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2018, 2:38 pm by Eric Dama
Recently, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion that will have a significant impact in federal age discrimination cases against government employers. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 11:37 am by Catherine V. Wadhwani
District Court for the Eastern District of California issued its ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*While the Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District [School District], a participating employer in the New York State Health Insurance Program [NYSHIP] administered by the New York State Department of Civil Service, was negotiating the terms of new collective bargaining agreements with the Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers and its Clerical Unit and Teachers Unit, [Association], the Department of Civil Service issued its… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:25 am by Seth Hanft
It is hard to believe that nearly five months have passed since the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:21 am by Peter Margulies
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and have been fully approved for resettlement in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:59 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The United States Department of Labor ("DOL") Wage and Hour Division ("WHD") has issued its second "Administrator Interpretation" (No. 2010-2) addressing certain donning and doffing issues.First, WHD clarified the term "clothes" in relation to Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). 29 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
Smithkline Beecham Corporation, No. 10-15257 On August 10, 2010, the United States Department of Labor filed an amicus curae brief in support of the Plaintiffs, current and former pharmaceutical representatives, in the matter of Christopher v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:18 am by Steven G. Pearl
Washington Department of Corrections, the Department of Corrections (DOC) designated a "limited number of female-only correctional positions—specifically, 110 positions to patrol housing units, prison grounds, and work sites. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
States and political subdivisions of states are not employers within the meaning of the National Labor Relations ActFord v D.C. 37 Union Local 1549, CA2d Circuit, Docket No. 08-2317-cvRoxanne Ford appealed a judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New dismissing her complaint alleging that DC-37 breached the duty of fair representation.Ford, however, had filed her claims against DC-37 pursuant to the federal… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am by Suzanna Sherry
Texas Department of Public Safety, to be argued on Tuesday, the Supreme Court will decide whether a private individual can sue his state-agency employer for violating the federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:37 pm
The Department of Justice's (DOJ) Antitrust Division recently filed two complaints (United States v. [read post]
Clearly, the government argued, Butina was in contact with Russian intelligence officials during her time in the United States. [read post]