Search for: "Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brackeen, the Court upheld the Indian Child Welfare Act and I admit several of the justices did use origi [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
This extension will be provided automatically and does not require a request by disputing parties. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Ahmed v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The Open Rights Group have raised concerns about an amendment that would allow the DWP to review the bank accounts of welfare recipients with a view to detecting fraud. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
” Heldebrandt v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Justice Department (DOJ) and Google, and the very recently concluded trial of the DOJ’s “monopoly maintenance” case. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
Back in 1981, so more than 40 years ago, in Beck v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) In the Matter of Jane Doe I (Indian Child Welfare Act) Rivera v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am
Steagald v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
”’[13] However, this is a limited obligation and does not guarantee the right to live free from poverty more generally. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
,v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:22 am
The conclusion that the property “does not/will not jeopardise the safety and welfare of [the] children” was perverse in the light of the occupational therapist’s assessments from January 2022. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Like Mallory, disgruntled current or former employees, plan members, or other opposing parties in disputes may choose to file their lawsuit in the state with the laws, rules, or precedent most favorable to their position even where the dispute does not arise out of events occurring in the chosen state. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
V. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
” With regard to the goals of the law, and whether the law achieves its goals, the parties had very different views: Prior to the vote on Proposition 12, proponents suggested the law would benefit animal welfare and consumer health, and opponents claimed that existing farming practices did better than Proposition 12 protecting animal welfare (for example, by preventing pig-on-pig aggression) and ensuring consumer health (by avoiding contamination). [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
” With regard to the goals of the law, and whether the law achieves its goals, the parties had very different views: Prior to the vote on Proposition 12, proponents suggested the law would benefit animal welfare and consumer health, and opponents claimed that existing farming practices did better than Proposition 12 protecting animal welfare (for example, by preventing pig-on-pig aggression) and ensuring consumer health (by avoiding contamination). [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:37 am
Indeed, the case that the Police Department cites, U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
