Search for: "Department of Revenue v. Public Service Co." Results 81 - 100 of 342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The consultation focuses on the size of the services covered and what uses are being targeted. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This First Amendment right of access applies to "the press and general public," Globe Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Ors. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
And Dillon LJ in Anheuser-Busch at pp 475-476 cited Spalding, Star Industrialand Inland Revenue Commissioners v Mullerto make the same point. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
It also encompasses “any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential damages incurred because of interruption of service. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
The Destination Test was largely utilized until 1954, when I.R.C. section 502 changed the perspective of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Her day-to-day work encompasses both labor and employment issues, as well as independent contractor, outsourcing, employee leasing, management services and other nontraditional service relationships. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Supreme Court Holds Agreement Provision Prohibiting Divorce until Apartment Sold Violated Public Policy Governing Divorces in New York           In Filstein v Bromberg, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1167458 (N.Y.Sup.) the parties were married in 1989. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:11 am by kgu
The bipartisan bill, The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, would close the current legal loophole through which the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Internal Revenue Service, have repeatedly purchased Americans’ personal and consumer information from data brokers. [read post]