Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. N."
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
As claimant's contentions constitute a failure to hire claim, they are unavailing; Civil Service Law § 58 (1) (a) falls squarely within the law enforcement exception of the ADEA (see Feldman v Nassau County, 434 F3d at 184; Petrelli v City of Mount Vernon, 9 F3d 250, 253 [2nd Cir 1993]; Ruderman v Police Dept. of City of New York, 857 F Supp 326, 329 [SD NY 1994]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
As claimant's contentions constitute a failure to hire claim, they are unavailing; Civil Service Law § 58 (1) (a) falls squarely within the law enforcement exception of the ADEA (see Feldman v Nassau County, 434 F3d at 184; Petrelli v City of Mount Vernon, 9 F3d 250, 253 [2nd Cir 1993]; Ruderman v Police Dept. of City of New York, 857 F Supp 326, 329 [SD NY 1994]). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Determining if a complaint alleging sexual harassment based a claim of a continuing violation of New York State's Human Rights Law is timelyLozada v Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The ALJ further determined that the Town's actions had been taken in retaliation for the complainant's litigation before the DHR. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The ALJ further determined that the Town's actions had been taken in retaliation for the complainant's litigation before the DHR. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am
Gebhard and Co., Inc., 570 Pa. 148.Leo Gustafson v Town of N. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Gebhard & Co., Inc., 570 Pa. 148.Leo Gustafson v Town of N. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:22 am
[v] Alex Merritt & Daniel Maroon, COVID-19 Impacts: California Governor Newsom’s Executive Order Explained (Apr. 8, 2020). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
Alaska Public Offices Com'n v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
”) Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
