Search for: "Diamond v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Michael C. Smith
Yesterday a Tyler jury in Judge Leonard Davis' court rendered a verdict in Reedhycalog v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
She detailed the jewelry, to include four diamond rings, diamond earrings, other rings, pearls, necklaces, gold items, and some costume jewelry. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 8:40 am
Hines, 883 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Black Diamond Props., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:30 am by Joy
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of March 21, 2022 from Wise Law on Twitter:Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds 26 Month Notice PeriodToronto lawyer Jeremy Diamond deserves more than a reprimand, tribunal rulesGinni Thomas Says She Attended Jan. 6 RallyU.K. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Davis, (Journal of Islamic Law [Harvard] (2022)).From SmartCILP:Christian Zendri, Book Review. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am by The Docket Navigator
Diamond Innovations Inc., 6-08-cv-00325 (TXED August 2, 2010, Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:48 am by Broc Romanek
Webcast: “Underwriter’s Counsel: Latest Developments” Tune in tomorrow for the webcast – “Underwriter’s Counsel: Latest Developments” – during which White & Case’s Colin Diamond, Cravath’s LizAnn Eisen and Davis Polk’s Joe Hall will explore the latest developments that impact underwriter’s counsel, including negotiating the underwriting agreement, obtaining a comfort letter and making filings with FINRA. -… [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
App. 127, 189 N.W.2d 879 (1971), reversed on other grounds, 389 Mich. 249, 205 N.W.2d 431 (1973); Davis v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 8:01 am by Dan Bressler
And earlier this year, on February 13, 2020, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals essentially made the same finding in Diamond v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:20 am
[w]hat one purchaser may rely upon in entering into a contract may not be material to another purchaser”)  First District Court of Appeal Davis v. [read post]