Search for: "Diaz v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
The Court, in a majority opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg, reinforced the Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:58 am
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear another case raising the issue of the scope of the Sixth Amendment Right of Confrontation. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-10876.pdf Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:06 am
Last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:11 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States disagreed, however. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:41 am
"Diaz Reus v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
The SJC, following the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez Diaz v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:41 pm
Robinson and United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:00 pm
In Melendez-Diaz, for example, the United States Supreme Court held that certificate of drug analyses, prepared by chemists when testing whether a particular item is a controlled substance, are testimonial in nature and, in order to be admissible, the drug lab experts should be called to testify. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:07 pm
The United States Supreme Court is expected to release its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
